{"name":"C Suite Biologics Peptide COA Review Worksheet","publisher":"C Suite Biologics","canonical_page":"https://csuitebiologics.com/research-peptides/peptide-coa-review-worksheet","version":"2026-08-29","purpose":"A reusable laboratory template for reviewing peptide certificate identity, lot traceability, analytical results, methods, limitations, and disposition.","limitation":"The worksheet organizes review evidence. It does not validate a certificate, establish an untested attribute, replace laboratory qualification, or determine fitness for an experiment.","allowed_status_values":["confirmed","needs review","not reported","not applicable"],"field_count":15,"fields":[{"section":"Document","field_id":"document_id","field":"Report identifier","review_question":"Does the record have a unique report or certificate identifier?","evidence_to_record":"Report number, revision, and source URL or file name","status":"","review_notes":""},{"section":"Document","field_id":"laboratory","field":"Testing laboratory","review_question":"Is the laboratory clearly identified with a verifiable contact or public record?","evidence_to_record":"Laboratory name, location or contact, and verification source","status":"","review_notes":""},{"section":"Document","field_id":"report_dates","field":"Dates","review_question":"Are sample receipt, analysis, and report dates stated and internally consistent?","evidence_to_record":"Receipt date, analysis date, issue date, and revision date","status":"","review_notes":""},{"section":"Traceability","field_id":"sample_identity","field":"Submitted sample","review_question":"Does the submitted material name and stated strength match the package and purchase record?","evidence_to_record":"Product name, sequence or blend where applicable, strength, and format","status":"","review_notes":""},{"section":"Traceability","field_id":"lot_batch","field":"Lot or batch","review_question":"Does one unique lot or batch connect the report, physical package, and receiving record?","evidence_to_record":"Lot or batch from each source and any discrepancy","status":"","review_notes":""},{"section":"Traceability","field_id":"package_link","field":"Package linkage","review_question":"Can the tested sample be connected to the received package without relying on an unsupported assumption?","evidence_to_record":"Label image, receiving record, chain-of-custody record, or unresolved gap","status":"","review_notes":""},{"section":"Analytical results","field_id":"identity_result","field":"Identity","review_question":"Which method supports identity, and what result and acceptance criterion were reported?","evidence_to_record":"Method, observed result, expected result, specification, and conclusion","status":"","review_notes":""},{"section":"Analytical results","field_id":"chromatographic_purity","field":"Chromatographic purity","review_question":"Is the purity value tied to a named chromatographic method and calculation?","evidence_to_record":"Method, detector, area percentage, specification, and conclusion","status":"","review_notes":""},{"section":"Analytical results","field_id":"chromatogram","field":"Chromatogram","review_question":"Is the underlying trace available with axes, peak labels, integration, and sample identity?","evidence_to_record":"Trace location, main retention time, included peaks, and any integration concern","status":"","review_notes":""},{"section":"Analytical results","field_id":"quantity_content","field":"Quantity or content","review_question":"Was peptide amount measured separately from chromatographic area percentage?","evidence_to_record":"Method, result, units, uncertainty where reported, specification, and conclusion","status":"","review_notes":""},{"section":"Analytical results","field_id":"additional_tests","field":"Additional attributes","review_question":"Which additional attributes were actually tested rather than implied?","evidence_to_record":"Named test, method, result, units, and specification for each attribute","status":"","review_notes":""},{"section":"Method review","field_id":"method_context","field":"Method context","review_question":"Does the report provide enough method, reference, calibration, and sample-preparation context for the claim?","evidence_to_record":"Method identifier, reference material, calibration, preparation, detector, and limitations","status":"","review_notes":""},{"section":"Method review","field_id":"verification","field":"Independent verification","review_question":"Can the original record be verified directly with the issuing laboratory or public report system?","evidence_to_record":"Verification URL, access code, confirmation date, and reviewer","status":"","review_notes":""},{"section":"Decision","field_id":"untested_attributes","field":"Untested attributes","review_question":"Are sterility, endotoxin, safety, biological activity, stability, and fitness left unclaimed unless tested?","evidence_to_record":"Explicit limitations and any unsupported claim requiring resolution","status":"","review_notes":""},{"section":"Decision","field_id":"disposition","field":"Review disposition","review_question":"Is the acceptance, rejection, quarantine, or information-request decision documented?","evidence_to_record":"Disposition, rationale, reviewer, review date, and follow-up owner","status":"","review_notes":""}]}